Code, a password to infinite
Prof. Enrica Colabella.
Generative Design Lab. Politecnico di Milano,
Italy
e-mail: enrica.colabella@polimi.it
Abstract
This paper tries to investigate around the concept of code, as identity of a theme, and of variations, as results of a generative process. The hypothesis is that infinite rises in a borderline between a visionary world and an interpreted reality with a strong connected dualism. As in Nature the first gets from a dynamic centre, in endless variations until the border, the second by using diachronic matrixes moves unsteadily toward a static centre for delineating open systems of transforming rules. This is a creative route in the site of the Myth of Sisyphus.
1. Aims: To investigate in a creative process, by getting into focus how to
define an idea/code for building endless variations.
Preludio
Fig.1Tiziano, Il mito di
Sisifo |
The site of the Myth of Sisyphus.
If we image that Sisyphus rises
his eyes and looks to his reality at a distance as in another contest
with a new imaginary borderline, by feeling not only what happened, but also how is exactly the frame of his life
in a new consciousness of human beings, we can see a freedom root. The endless
repetitions become variations of the theme toward infinite. These are like
frames of a new complex reality, in which memory can loose its domain and hope
can rise.
2. An hypothesis
By learning to discover reality it is a visionary procedure that defines the dual structure between a discovered reality and a new idea of transformation as a coherent open system.
2.1 First step:
At a distance
…. A spatial distance….. by discovering a viewpoint.
In “Zibaldone” Leopardi said : “It exists in human beings an imaginary ability that can conceive things that are not and in a way in which real things are not… man goes wandering in an imaginary world and he figures things that he could not if his vision extended in all, because reality excluded imaginary.” (12-13/07/1820)
Interpretation is an essential condition of a visionary process that starts by
choosing a viewpoint.
In
Perspectiva Artificialis working from 3d to 2d we can define
theoretically all the points of space as points of view, but when we choose a
point and an horizon we build an artificial scenario that is starting inside
infinite. So we can realize endless representations of the same space in a dynamic approach.
It is also possible, as i.e. in this (Fig. 2)
“Ovale della prospettiva della Piazza Granducale” by Bernardino Gaffurri
(Firenze 1606), to manage a complex system running from two different
viewpoints. This ambiguity is a strong tool to open mind toward a possible
interpretation.
Fig 2 |
3.2
Reverted vision
If
we work from 2d to 3d using a reverse perspective process, we can design
generative codes of transformation with a set of possible 3D results that start
from each 2D shape. More in general we can use the multiplicity of results made
by the passage from a dimension to the upper dimension. In other words, a two-dimensional image, as a
photo or a sketch that represent a possible our imaginary, is really extremely
useful when we move from a dimension to a more high one by following our
interpretation. This procedure finds again in a substitution group the
generative potentiality of describing unexpected configurations of the author’
idea/code.
We
can define a point of view but only in a coherent system, that works as a
supreme invariable. This is a binding condition to recognize the
figuration. The dynamical interchanging as interpretative hypothesis
is only on choosing a point on the line toward infinite. So we have a limited
combination, also if in a big number, of the2d picture. This happens because
the relationship structure of the picture is the product of a historical fixed
imaginary.
In
“ The not Euclidean Image” Celestino Soddu wrote about his experimental work in
defining 3D interpretative models with a reverse perspective.
Fig.3 |
Fig.4 |
Fig.3 “Il bambino azzannato dal lupo” by Simone Martini, 1328
Fig.4 Two axonometric views of 3D models, as
results of 2 different view points of a reverse perspective
Fig.5 |
Fig.6 |
Fig. 5/6
Perspective representations of the identical model by using in sequence a
horizontal rotation of 22,5 degree. In this passage, all the possible
three-dimensional structures that are generated are able to represent, in their
multiplicity, the discovered visions inside the previous two-dimensional one.
3. 3 Anamorphosis and not Euclidean
perspective
By
analysing Van Gogh, Celestino Soddu defined first algorithms directly connected to natural vision and
after he used anamorphosis for
representing the totality of the space in a temporal vision.
|
|
Fig.7 The room of Van Gogh
Fig.8 A curved perspective |
Total
Perspectives with a viewpoint inside the room
|
|
Fig.
9 The viewpoint is closed to the bed Fig.
10 An oblique vision in a side Fig.
12 And in the other side Fig.
12 A total perspective traced on a cylinder in axonometric representation |
1.3.2
Natural
infinite
Leonardo defined philosophy as “images of mental talk” by
drawing a deep parallelism between Nature and Reason. Luca Pacioli suggested
Leonardo to read the V book by Euclide. This was a basic point that he extended
with genial intuition, by using proportions also in time, space, sounds,
weights, sites etc. By this scientific investigation he discovered “… varie e strane forme fatte dalla
artificiosa Natura…”
( ..variant strange shapes made by Artificial
Nature..), that he fixed in sketches
and used later as codes in his works.
His scripts edited only in 1881 were pressed as a
simple first draft on a wax table in only one passage, by using a Roman
technique. These were written all in a reverse way. It is possible
to read them only in front of a mirror, for emerging a similarity between
natural process and interpreted reality.
Fig 14
Mechanical wing by Leonardo
|
Hand can use a double direction to write vision.
From left site to right, from east to west, the
vision of God in human beings as connection between result and matrix. A centripetal vision that works for
uniqueness and defined quantity. In this configuration it is also a way from up
to down, toward an unchanging centre as permutations of an eternal set.
From right site to left, from west to east, the
maternal vision toward human beings as natural infinite in a centrifugal
process. Leonardo with his reverse scripts describes this process, by
representing the maternal vision.
|
|
|
Fig. 16 The right hand of Madonna litta by
Leonardo Fig. 17
The nearly profile of Madonna Fig. 18 The right hand and look of baby |
1.2.2 Second step: A
temporal distance
1.2.2
…. A coherent
time…..
An allegory
Time, Real and Imaginary
An Allegory
by Coleridge
On the wide level of a mountain’s
head...
Two lovely children run
an endless race,
A sister
and a brother!
This far outstripp’d the other;
Yet ever runs she with reverted
face,
And looks and listens
for the boy behind:
For he, alas! Is blind!
O’er rough and smooth with
even step he passed,
And knows not whether he
be first at last.
If
we define a code, as open strata of diachronic matrixes, we can generate new
endless variations.
If we see the generative work by Celestino Soddu
about “Medieval Towns Morphogenesis” , we can discover codes and matrices that
work to produce endless variations of the same identity.
|
|
Fig 19/20 Four different Scenarios of Medieval Towns
generated from an interpretation of frescos by Giotto and Simone Martini |
Also in
“Old Chicago”, we can discover new generated Scenarios in perfect
harmony with ancient environment, such as to seem with the same cultural time
code.
|
|
|
Fig. 21/22/23 Different Scenarios of generated
sky scrapers in Chicago of the beginning of the last century |
1.2.2 ….a reverse time…
Some days ago people got the news that after seven centuries the tomb of Petrarca will be opened for rebuilding his physiognomy with VR. But it might be for his DNA too
|
The question is: a
Petrarca clone will be a Poet? In a strong temporal distance the same code will
rise a great poet in another contest? If yes, the code is the whole, but if we
read this fragment:
“If we were not something more than unique human
beings, if each one of us could really be done away with once and for all by a
single bullet, story telling would lose all purpose. But every man is more than just himself; he also represents the
unique, the very special and always significant and remarkable point at which the
world’s phenomena intersect, only once this way and never again. That is why every man’s story is important,
eternal, sacred; that is why every man, as long as he lives and fulfills the
will of nature, is wondrous, and worthy of every consideration”. Hermann Hesse, Demian (1917)
We can simply deduce that story telling are
losing all purpose. So the clone of Petrarca cannot be a poet. But this is not
enough.
5. Conclusions
We can
only say
In "Zibaldone" Leopardi said:" It
is infinite a labor of our imagination… infinite is an idea, a dream not a
reality: at least we have not any proof of its existence, not even by
analogy."
G.Leopardi, Zibaldone, Newton
Compton, Roma 1997
H. Hesse, Peter Camenzind, Gertrud, Rosshalde, Demian, Newton Compton,
Roma 1992
C.Soddu, "L'immagine non euclidea" (The not euclidean Image), Gangemi, Villa San Giovanni(RC), 1987.
C.Soddu, "L'idea di spazio nelle rappresentazioni d'arte", (the space idea in Art representation), in "Critica d'arte" magazine, n.16, Firenze ,Gennaio/Marzo 1988.
C.Soddu, "Citta' Aleatorie", (Random cities), Masson., Milano 1989
C.Soddu, E.Colabella, "Il progetto ambientale di morfogenesi", (The environmental design of morphogenesis), Progetto Leonardo, Bologna 1992
I